For schools and academies
Racing schools and karting academies run programmes that produce many drivers, many sessions, many development plans — week after week. LAP is built for the individual driver first, but the same capture, the same review, and the same per-driver development plan extend cleanly to a roster.
Multi-seat billing and operator-side reporting are roadmap items, not shipping today. The door is open earlier than that — if your programme is the kind LAP should be built around, we want to hear about it.
What a programme gets
Every session a driver runs becomes a per-driver development plan: weakness shape, drill, success criterion, review cadence. The same Pillar 4 framework that surfaces for an individual subscriber, applied across your whole roster without anyone retyping a coaching note.
The same capture and the same review handle iRacing and AMS2 sessions on the school's rigs, GPS captures from the kart-track day, and on-track sessions from the academy's test days. If your programme runs both — most do — the per-driver record stays continuous between platforms instead of fragmenting across tools.
No language-model-generated coaching narrative. Every prescription a driver receives traces to a hand-curated written rule the LAP coaching team maintains in public. That matters when a parent or programme director asks why a particular drill was chosen — there is a defensible answer, every time.
Pricing
Multi-seat pricing starts from €10 per seat per month for programmes of 10 or more drivers. The number is finalised in conversation — we work backwards from your roster size, your session cadence, and the support level your programme expects, and we put the final figure in writing before anything is signed.
Programmes under 10 drivers usually fit better at the consumer €15 per month tier; we set them up the same way and bill per driver, no separate B2B contract needed.
Send an inquiry → or [email protected] for a quote.
Case study
A case study ships here after our first programme wraps. It will be published with the operator's permission and will name the academy, the cohort size, the corner pattern that became the focus of the term, and the per-driver outcomes measured against the development-plan criteria the operator and we set together at the start.
Until then this slot stays a placeholder. We would rather wait for a real cohort review than fill it with a fabricated quote. If your programme could be the first one, the inbound link is the same as the hero — write to [email protected].
Operator-facing reading
Coaching framework, technique deep-dives, and the build-in-public updates ship under the same byline as the product. If your programme is evaluating LAP, this is the depth we operate at.