Driver Profile
Your progression, six months in.
The driver profile is the part of LAP you check least and use most. It is the running record of your shape as a driver — strengths, weaknesses, drills attempted, drills closed — built session by session out of every sim stint and every track day, on one timeline, per driver.
The shape of your driving
A record of what we have actually seen.
The profile is not a star rating, and it is not a leaderboard. It is a record of what the platform has actually seen you do — across sessions, across tracks, across cars. The shape of your driving over time, in place of a folder of telemetry files you never look at again. When a friend asks you what kind of driver you are, the profile is what you could open and answer with.
Three views matter day-to-day. Strengths — where the platform is confident you are above your reference. Weaknesses — recurring issues with their lifecycle visible: open, improving, resolved, dormant. And drills — what you have been working on, what worked, what did not. The same record, three angles.
Skill dimensions
Ten axes, not one number.
A single overall rating compresses too much. The profile scores you across ten skill dimensions instead — braking, throttle pickup, minimum speed through corners, line consistency, tyre management, racecraft, fatigue consistency, strategy execution, setup sensitivity, and adaptation to new tracks and cars. Each dimension carries its own score, its own 14-day trend, and its own evidence trail of which sessions fed it.
The dimensions also segment by context. Strong on braking in GT3 cars at Spa, weaker on braking in LMP at Le Mans — those are two different rows in the profile, not one averaged number that hides the gap. Indexing is the same across the platform: by track and by car class. The driver profile inherits those axes from the coaching library, which is what makes the loop close: a weakness flagged at La Source on a Mercedes GT3 reads against your braking-at-Spa-in-GT3 score, not against your driving in general.
Sim and real, one timeline
One profile per driver, both halves.
The whole point of a profile, as opposed to a per-platform dashboard, is that it does not care whether the session came from your sim rig or your track day. Sim sessions and real-world sessions feed the same skill dimensions, the same weakness episodes, the same progression. A weakness flagged on iRacing in March, attacked through prescriptions in April, then re-checked on the actual circuit in May — that is one continuous arc on the profile, not two separate stories pretending to be unrelated.
The bridge is what makes the cross-platform shape transferable; the driver profile is where the shape lands. Six months of sim work plus three track days does not become a spreadsheet you forget about — it becomes a record that says, here is what you started as, here is what you have moved, here is what you are still working on.
Score with confidence
The number is honest about what it knows.
Every dimension carries a confidence value next to its score. The platform tells you when a number is the result of forty sessions of evidence and when it is the result of three. Confidence decays over time without re-observation: if you have not driven a circuit in three months, the score for it dims, and the open weakness episodes there go dormant rather than pretending they are still live findings.
That is the honest version of progression tracking, and it is the version that comes out of measurement rather than a model that talks about you. You see how good the platform thinks you are, and you see how sure the platform is. Those two lines together are what a driver profile is for.